GTRC in an International Context
After sharing about how she came into the work of transitional justice, Lisa asked the interns if they thought a transformation was going on in Greensboro. She asked if the transitional justice framework is even relevant in a community that has not just been through a civil war or emerged from a dictatorship. Some interns' reflections were as follows:
- The transition started during the Civil Rights movement and never really was completed. The Greensboro case is interesting because of when it happened (1979) and because of all of the components--race, labor, communism, etc.
- If the GTRC is using this framework of transitional justice, shouldn't it be looking at pre-1964 situations? (In response to this comment, Lisa Magarrell pointed out that no community should think about transition as a clear line marking pre and post transition time periods.)
One of our interns followed up this conversation by asking Lisa what she thought about the City Council's opposition of the truth and reconciliation process. In response, Lisa said:
"The Greensboro case has made me think differently about TRCs, which have previously all been sponsored by or initiated by government bodies...Government support can be helpful and constraining at the same time. Some people may be reluctant to speak to a government sponsored TRC. And some governments may use TRCs as a mouthpiece for whatever version of history they want to maintain. What some Greensboro City Council Members said was helpful--because this TRC grew out of a grassroots movement, it answers to the community and not the City Council. This shows your independence from governmental or other bodies of any kind."
posted by Jill Williams, Exec. Dir.
